From: Toby C. <tco...@di...> - 2005-07-07 20:15:55
|
> just turned in the report yesterday. Right now, it's built to use > the standard position3d interface, with all the problems that come > along with it. The model works quite well, but can Hi, My first thought when thinking about arm interfaces was that we should just use position3d to describe it along with a seperate actuator interface for fine control, obviously this discussion has moved on from there, but there have been a couple of posts sugesting we come full circle and joing position 3d and arm back together. Anyway my question is what specifically are 'all the problems that come along with it' in your experience? It might help avoid these issues popping up with the planned interface. Toby |