From: Jack O'Q. <jac...@gm...> - 2009-07-23 14:29:08
|
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Toby Collett<tco...@pl...> wrote: > I have been informed that there are a few license issues stopping player 2.1 > getting in to debian. In particular there are some source files with no > license info, and a mix in GPL v2 and v3 licenses. > > I would like to propose the following license policy, and then if there is > no major problem with it I will work on making the source meet the proposed > structure, this may even mean that some drivers of dubious origin need to be > dropped. > > Firstly, where GPL licenses are involved we use v2 or v2+, we have far fewer > v3 files in the repo, so it is easier to change them than the rest. > All file must have their license in a header at the start of the file. > Unless otherwise stated, all files are LGPL compatible > The exceptions to LGPL are > - that the server (including libplayerdrivers) and utils will be GPL > compatible > - anything in examples we should go for BSD compat (This will require some > relicensing so we will have to see how plausible it is) > > The goal is to: > 1) keep things simple > 2) maximise the usefulness of player, while still encouraging contribution > of features and fixes. > > Comments welcome... That sounds reasonable to me. -- joq |