From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-17 21:53:51
|
Feature Requests item #548243, was opened at 2002-04-24 12:09 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by soulcatcher You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=548243&group_id=25576 Category: Code Related (Add/Del/Improve) Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 2 Submitted By: Peter Donis (peter_donis) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Special Abilities vs. Attacks/Qualities Initial Comment: Right now there's only one "Special Ability" tag, which throws together things that are race features, class features, "special attacks", and "special qualities" (the last two as they are normally shown in monster stat blocks). It would be nice to have a way of sorting items that are now all "SA" into one of these four "bins"--or at least into the last two, so that the "standard" monster stat block could be output (right now that can't be done because there is only one list of "special abilities", some are attacks and some aren't). Maybe something like this: SA:text would be a "special attack" SQ:text would be a "special quality" SA:text|TYPE=RaceFeature, SA:text|TYPE=ClassFeature, SA:text|TYPE=SomethingElse, etc. would allow sorting by where the ability came from. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Doug McMillan (dmcmill) Date: 2004-02-17 19:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=705399 review after the xml conversion ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2004-02-02 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Doug further thoughts? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2003-08-20 04:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Actually I'm going to bump this up, it supports core WoTC material ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2003-08-19 02:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Like to make it part of SA, like a subcategory instead of a new tag, allow OS's to do it either as one list, or break up, as the user wishes (both forms of functionality). Prob. easier to do this after we go XML. Not a high priority at all in my mind, but somehting I'd like to eventually see done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2003-05-06 20:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Any further on this Tir? K TM SB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2003-01-28 05:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 This would move SA's away from a single array, as they are treated now. The latter part, we could possibly do just off of where the SA came from (all SA's from CLASS objects, etc) Barak and I both like this idea. Now I need to figure out if we really want an SQ tag or if we want to bury that into the SA tag somehow. Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2002-06-11 00:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 This needs a Code Monkey Champion! Karianna Tracker Monkey ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=548243&group_id=25576 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-07-07 16:07:38
|
Feature Requests item #548243, was opened at 2002-04-24 14:09 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kingpaul You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=548243&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Code Related (Add/Del/Improve) Group: None >Status: Deleted >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 2 Submitted By: Peter Donis (peter_donis) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Special Abilities vs. Attacks/Qualities Initial Comment: Right now there's only one "Special Ability" tag, which throws together things that are race features, class features, "special attacks", and "special qualities" (the last two as they are normally shown in monster stat blocks). It would be nice to have a way of sorting items that are now all "SA" into one of these four "bins"--or at least into the last two, so that the "standard" monster stat block could be output (right now that can't be done because there is only one list of "special abilities", some are attacks and some aren't). Maybe something like this: SA:text would be a "special attack" SQ:text would be a "special quality" SA:text|TYPE=RaceFeature, SA:text|TYPE=ClassFeature, SA:text|TYPE=SomethingElse, etc. would allow sorting by where the ability came from. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Doug McMillan (dmcmill) Date: 2004-02-17 21:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=705399 review after the xml conversion ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2004-02-02 23:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Doug further thoughts? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2003-08-20 06:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Actually I'm going to bump this up, it supports core WoTC material ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2003-08-19 04:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Like to make it part of SA, like a subcategory instead of a new tag, allow OS's to do it either as one list, or break up, as the user wishes (both forms of functionality). Prob. easier to do this after we go XML. Not a high priority at all in my mind, but somehting I'd like to eventually see done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2003-05-06 22:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Any further on this Tir? K TM SB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2003-01-28 07:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 This would move SA's away from a single array, as they are treated now. The latter part, we could possibly do just off of where the SA came from (all SA's from CLASS objects, etc) Barak and I both like this idea. Now I need to figure out if we really want an SQ tag or if we want to bury that into the SA tag somehow. Tir Gwaith ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2002-06-11 02:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 This needs a Code Monkey Champion! Karianna Tracker Monkey ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=548243&group_id=25576 |