[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for uml: Update UML environment to Linux 3.13.1, busybox 1.21.1 [#762]

[Anders W. <and...@er...>]

Summary: uml: Update UML environment to Linux 3.13.1, busybox 1.21.1 [#762]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 762
Peer Reviewer(s): Lennart
Pull request to: 
Affected branch(es): opensaf-4.2.x, opensaf-4.3.x, opensaf-4.4.x, default(4.5)
Development branch: default

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   y


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
changeset 8631919bdd815be3e70e9fc389d84c5911cc2b54
Author:	Anders Widell <and...@er...>
Date:	Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:06:00 +0100

	uml: Update UML environment to Linux 3.13.1, busybox 1.21.1 [#762]

	Update the kernel version used in UML, so that it starts up properly on
	Fedora 20. The new kernel version also fixes the problem that UML did not
	work with a memory size larger than the default 128 MiB.


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 tools/cluster_sim_uml/uml/build_uml                  |    15 +-
 tools/cluster_sim_uml/uml/config/busybox-1.19.4      |  1001 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 tools/cluster_sim_uml/uml/config/busybox-1.21.1      |  1022 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/cluster_sim_uml/uml/config/linux-3.13.1-i686   |  1044 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/cluster_sim_uml/uml/config/linux-3.13.1-x86_64 |  1013 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/cluster_sim_uml/uml/config/linux-3.4.2-i686    |   947 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 tools/cluster_sim_uml/uml/config/linux-3.4.2-x86_64  |   918 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 7 files changed, 3090 insertions(+), 2870 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Build the UML environment and start it.


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
UML should build and start successfully.


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from reviewer.


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         y          y
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.