Re: [Netdisco] inconsistent port search results

[Oliver G. <ol...@cp...>]

On 2015-11-16 22:12, Mark Boolootian wrote:
> A good example of something that behaves inconsistently is a Port
> Search for 7919.  If I Port Search for just "7919", I get nothing 
> back.
> If I select "partial match" and run the search - same thing.  No 
> data.
> However, if I Port Search for "*7919", I get back the whole 
> collection
> of devices with "7919" appearing in the interface description 
> (partial
> match isn't needed for this).  I would expect that selecting partial
> match with a search for "7919" would have done the job - is that
> different than applying a regex somehow?

You're right, that does smell inconsistent. Needs some investigation I 
think...

> Many thanks.  Always good to see you come up for air, Oliver!

:-)

regards,
oliver.