Re: [Motion-user] Adding a section named "Working setups"

[Freitas <ca...@gm...>]

>  I am not sure if it is the right place to introduce this
> suggestion, but, lets go.
>
>  I would like to suggest the addition of a section named "working
> setups", just like "Working devices", but to describe the setups
> working with motion. I mean: operating system, computers (CPU, RAM, HD
> etc ), motion versions, cgis, auxiliary scripts, cameras ( kind and
> number ), difficulties and solutions and so on.
>
>
>  I think the only catch with such a section is that what one person
> considers acceptable results may not be acceptable to someone else.  For
> instance, at my home, if my cameras catch someone at my front door, I kno=
w
> immediately whether the person should be there or not and I don't need to
> see minute details of their actions.  Just their presence there is
> suspicious.
>
>  One the other hand, someone using motion in a retail location where they
> have many people coming into their shop that may or may not be up to "no
> good" would not be satisfied with the results that I get because they wan=
t
> to be able to catch very subtle actions such as shoplifting that require
> very high frame rates and high resolution.
>
>  In this case, simple identification is sufficient for me, while for a
> retailer identification and complete capture of all activity is required.
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  Jeff G.

     Well, I think that it is another good reason to have a such section. :=
-)
     I mean, your description is a tip for me. I will save this email,
because I liked the considerations you did. So, if we could have that
section, with a description of your solution and your considerations,
it would be, in my opinion,  a rich knowledge tree.
     I would have, for example, a working solution to be sure that,
under certain circunstances, there is already something similar
working, so, in some degree, that solution is possible.
     Sorry for my bad english and thanks for your consideration.

Best regards,

C=E1ssio Freitas