From: Bruce M <bru...@gm...> - 2009-05-11 15:06:45
|
Hey Steve, Thanks for the reply. It is actually a 2.2Ghz AMD64 3500. Not too old. What do people with 4 cameras on one core do? I compile motion manually. I am using a 640x480 resolution and 30fps. Here are my settings: daemon off process_id_file /var/run/motion/motion.pid setup_mode off videodevice /dev/video1 v4l2_palette 8 input 1 norm 1 frequency 0 rotate 0 width 640 height 480 framerate 30 minimum_frame_time 0 netcam_tolerant_check off auto_brightness off brightness 0 contrast 0 saturation 0 hue 0 roundrobin_frames 1 roundrobin_skip 1 switchfilter off threshold 300 threshold_tune off noise_level 32 despeckle EedDdDdDdDl mask_file /mask5.pgm smart_mask_speed 0 minimum_motion_frames 1 pre_capture 5 post_capture 40 gap 120 max_mpeg_time 0 output_all off output_normal on output_motion off quality 100 ppm off ffmpeg_cap_new on ffmpeg_cap_motion off ffmpeg_timelapse 0 ffmpeg_timelapse_mode daily ffmpeg_bps 500000 ffmpeg_variable_bitrate 2 ffmpeg_video_codec mpeg4 ffmpeg_deinterlace off snapshot_interval 0 locate on text_right %Y-%m-%d\n%T-%q text_changes on text_event %Y%m%d%H%M%S text_double off target_dir /new/motion snapshot_filename %v-%Y%m%d%H%M%S-snapshot jpeg_filename %Y/jpeg/FrontCam-%H_%M_%S-%v-%q movie_filename %Y/%m/%d/video_%H_%M_%S-%v timelapse_filename %Y%m%d-timelapse webcam_port 8081 webcam_quality 75 webcam_motion on webcam_maxrate 5 webcam_localhost off webcam_limit 0 control_port 8080 control_localhost off control_html_output on track_type 0 track_auto off track_motorx 0 track_motory 0 track_maxx 0 track_maxy 0 track_iomojo_id 0 track_step_angle_x 10 track_step_angle_y 10 track_move_wait 10 track_speed 255 track_stepsize 40 quiet on sql_log_image on sql_log_snapshot on sql_log_mpeg off sql_log_timelapse off sql_query insert into security(camera, filename, frame, file_type, time_stamp, event_time_stamp) values('%t', '%f', '%q', '%n', '%Y-%m-%d %T', '%C') Thanks, Bruce On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Steven Moix <ste...@ax...> wrote: > Hi Bruce > > On 05/11/2009 04:22 PM, Bruce M wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have one camera on a BT878 pinnacle card. The CPU usage while motion is > > running and not capturing any jpeg's is ~30%. > > The Cpu usage when motion is capturing is ~80%. > > Is this normal? > > I am running the latest Fedora and using 2gig of Ram on an AMD 3500+ cpu > > system. > > Are you using the RPM from RPM Fusion? > > > The CPU usage seems high?? If I add another camera and both are > detecting, I > > am afraid I will get too high of usage. > > What are others seeing as their usage? > > It really depends on a lot of things, but on my system (Fedora 11, > ffmpeg 0.5, Q9550) a 640x480 video capture at 20 fps doesn't exceed 40% > CPU usage on one core. An AMD 3500+ is quite an old system, these seem > reasonable numbers to me honestly...it just depends on your fps and > resolution. > > Steven > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your > production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to > Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK > i700 > Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image > processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com > _______________________________________________ > Motion-user mailing list > Mot...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user > http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome > |