Re: [mod-security-users] strmatch vs. pm
Brought to you by:
victorhora,
zimmerletw
From: Breno S. <bre...@gm...> - 2011-05-20 15:06:04
|
Hi Nick, 1 - Yes... the algorithm in @strmatch can be faster than @pm for a single pattern. However the entire overhead of the engine can make this difference imperceptible. 2 - This operator now supports the syntax : | 00 A4 B5| or b|65|eno to allow special chars. Thanks Breno On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nick Gearls <nic...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > > 1. Is @strmatch only a "light" (more efficient) version of @pm for one > word only, or are there other differences? > > 2. from 2.6 changes file: pmf, pm and strmatch now supports more > flexible input data allowing any kind of special char > What does that mean? In the doc: "The @pm operator phrases do not > support metacharacters" > > Thanks, > > > Nick > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! > Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its > next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran > developers boost performance applications - including clusters. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay > _______________________________________________ > mod-security-users mailing list > mod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mod-security-users > ModSecurity Services from Trustwave's SpiderLabs: > https://www.trustwave.com/spiderLabs.php > |