From: <AWL...@ao...> - 2003-05-20 01:37:03
|
In a message dated 5/19/2003 7:54:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, dan...@cl... writes: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stephan T. Lavavej" <st...@ca...> > To: <min...@li...> > Sent: Tuesday, 20 May 2003 01:37 > Subject: [Mingw-users] MinGW and Mainstream GCC > > > > I posted something about MinGW to the gc...@gc... mailing list, > and they > > suggested something that might make MinGW better integrated with gcc. > > > > The thread: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-05/msg01812.html > > > Interesting. Well all we need now is a "capable champion" who is > willing to give up free time so that they can answer questions like.... > > > > > By the way, when will we see MinGW gcc 3.3? > > I'm not going to answer that. Well if you won't (and I can understand why), why don't you create that MinGW GCC CVS branch? Unless you have some particular kind of attachment, I think it would be entirely worthwhile to get the source for MinGW GCC .diff's off your hard drive, so other people could help with whatever it is that is necessary to get these things out the door. If a CVS would be too much work, or unacceptable for some other reason, why not post the relevant files as-is on sf or the web somewhere? I am assuming there is some substancial changes between the latest 3.2.3 diff and whatever you have on your hard drive. I have time, and the will. But I can't do anything without the sources. Aaron > > Danny > > > > Thanks, > > Stephan T. Lavavej > > http://www.nuwen.net |