From: Joe M. <joe...@gm...> - 2006-07-10 23:19:52
|
How, or where, can I make a suggestion? It is simple, but I also understand it could be a daunting given the scope. Is it possible to add an option to disable one type of warning when compiling? That way when I get over 30000 warnings that are pointless I can disable just that warning and continue looking for more important warnings. Thank you for your help. jmccay |
From: Brian D. <br...@de...> - 2006-07-11 00:20:37
|
Joe McCay wrote: > How, or where, can I make a suggestion? It is simple, but I also > understand it could be a daunting given the scope. Is it possible to > add an option to disable one type of warning when compiling? That way > when I get over 30000 warnings that are pointless I can disable just > that warning and continue looking for more important warnings. Thank > you for your help. Are you aware that gcc has a manual? Have you read it? There exist already hundreds of various -W options to control individual warnings and errors. Examples: <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.6/gcc/Warning-Options.html> <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.6/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html> If a -W option does not currently exist to control the particular diagnostic that you are encountering (which you failed to specify, making this essentially a useless bug report) then you should report it on the gcc bug tracker or mailing list, not here. Gcc is a separate project. Brian |