[ mh-e-Patches-2945712 ] Postpone junk processing

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Patches item #2945712, was opened at 2010-02-03 21:23
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by wohler
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=313357&aid=2945712&group_id=13357

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 6
Private: No
Submitted By: Ted Phelps (tphelps)
>Assigned to: Bill Wohler (wohler)
Summary: Postpone junk processing

Initial Comment:
The attached patch adds new marks to the mh-e folder view to flag messages as white- or black-listed, so that the training of the junk mail filter can be postponed until mh-execute-commands is invoked.  This makes the behavior more consistent with the way refile and delete are already performed, makes it possible to undo a mis-labelling and moves the potentially slow junk mail filter training operation into a less inconvenient part of the workflow.

I hope you find it useful.

Thanks,
-Ted

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bill Wohler (wohler)
Date: 2011-12-26 21:11

Message:
Bumping priority to reward Ted for submitting papers :-).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bill Wohler (wohler)
Date: 2011-12-26 21:09

Message:
I confirmed your copyright assignment to the FSF. Thanks very much, Ted!
You're right, it's a pretty big patch. I am *so* glad your papers are in
order. If you aren't on holidays tomorrow, please try to pop into the #mh-e
channel at irc.freenode.net and help me out while I merge it during our bug
squashing party (BSP).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ted Phelps (tphelps)
Date: 2010-11-01 13:10

Message:
I realize that everyone is quite busy.  Would it make life easier if I were
to break this up into a series of smaller, easier-to-review patches?

-Ted


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ted Phelps (tphelps)
Date: 2010-07-19 21:50

Message:
My Emacs assignment/disclaimer paperwork is now complete (RT#548209), so
this large-ish patch can now be considered GPL-friendly from a copyright
point-of-view.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=313357&aid=2945712&group_id=13357