From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-29 12:06:28
|
Bugs item #1605201, was opened at 2006-11-29 06:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1605201&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Documentation Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Barton Willis (willisbl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: wronskian documentation Initial Comment: (1) Either wronskian needs to auotload, or the user documentation needs to say that to use the wronskian function you must load functs. (2) The last sentence of the user documentation is wrong: "The functions are linearly dependent if this determinant is zero." The standard counterexample is x -> x |x| and x -> x^2. On the reals, these functions are linearly independent, yet the determinant of their wronskian matrix vanishes. (3) The claim that "<f_1>, ..., <f_n> may be the names of user-defined functions, or.." is either wrong or misleading. Things like (%i41) f(x) := x^2$ (%i42) g(x) := x^3$ (%i43) wronskian([f,g],x); do not work. (4) Final non-documentation comment: If a Maxima function signals an error, if at all possible, the error should come from the calling function, not some other function. Thus I don't like: (%i45) wronskian(1+x,x); Invalid matrix row:x+1 If the first argument isn't a list, wronskian should either return a noun form, or signal an error such as "The first argument to wronskian must be a list." When the error comes from matrix, the user doesn't really know what went wrong or how to fix it. Barton ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1605201&group_id=4933 |