Re: [Maxima-discuss] smono with subvarp argument

[有坂富雄 <ari...@ic...>]

Thank you for your description.

I almost agree with you on thinking of the powerseries.
I am looking forward to your project.
If you need help, please let me know.

Regards,
Tomio Arisaka



On 2014-6-29, Barton Willis wrote:


> Does it mean the function powerseries includes some experimental codes?
> Please let me know what you think of the powerseries.

No, not really. I thought some bugs in powerseries were a bit hard to fix, so I started from scratch.
And like all such projects,  the first 90+% is easy and the rest is tedious. My from scratch code 
incorporates some code I wrote long ago that attempts to convert to hypergeometric form--bessel
functions, for example. After conversion, the power series of the hypergeometric is routine.

One thing I don't particularly like about the series.lisp code is that the function dispatch isn't, I think,
sufficient to deal with multivariate function (for example Bessel) Another thing about series.lisp
is that it apparently duplicates partial fraction code.

I don't know how much I'll work on this code---it was a fun thing I started one day. Maybe somebody would like to help me with it. That would be OK.

--Barton