From: Mike A. <ma...@dm...> - 2007-10-04 03:46:16
|
Frank, I would fully support this idea. Sharing the data bases would be a big bonus, but a bigger benefit will come from connecting the community of coordinate system experts. Yes let's use the mapbuilder tree for this for now. This may be a good candidate for the OSGeo Labs concept. Mike Frank Warmerdam wrote: > On 9/27/07, Mike Adair <ma...@dm...> wrote: > >> Or perhaps we can use the OSGeo infrastructure for svn, trac, and >> mailling lists? >> > > Mike / Rich, > > I'm very pleased to see things smoothing out. > > I've been kicking around the concept of a coordinate > systems related "meta project" for OSGeo that would > include CSMAP, PROJ.4, libproj4, your JavaScript > code, and perhaps some stuff for converting coordinate > system descriptions from OGR and supporting dictionaries > and datum shift files from a variety of sources. > > I'm thinking this, in part, because any one of the projections > projects along don't seem to be substantial enough to > justify the whole "project machinery", and because by > some loose federation it might be possible to achieve > better sharing - in particular of support dictionaries and > datum shift files. Possibly also test streams, and > coordinate system translation code (translating the > coordinate system descriptions as opposed to transforming > points). > > Pending this getting off the ground, perhaps things could > live in the mapbuilder tree for a while? > > Best regards, > |