Re: [Lxde-list] LXQT vs RazorQt

[Florian H. <dok...@ar...>]

Am 20.10.2014 um 09:59 schrieb Eugene Pivnev:
> Yet another: razorqt _already_ is in official repos.
> This means that it can be installed in some machines with Fedora or
> CentOS (and they are).
> This means that I can't remove razorqt from repos.
> And it is impossible to replace razorqt with lxqt on desktops/servers
> automatically.
Nope, not at all, please get your facts straight. Add proper Obsoletes
tags to your packages on the corresponding razorqt packages,
and they will be replaced by lxqt. How do you think distros do this?
>
> 20.10.2014 10:57, Dimitrios Glentadakis:
>> ----- Mail original -----
>>> De: "Eugene Pivnev" <ti....@gm...>
>>> À: lxd...@li...
>>> Envoyé: Lundi 20 Octobre 2014 07:53:07
>>> Objet: Re: [Lxde-list] LXQT vs RazorQt
>>>
>>> 20.10.2014 03:58, Florian Hubold:
>>>> Replace razorqt with lxqt? Why do you want to keep them in
>>>> parallel,
>>>> what's the benefit
>>> RazorQt already _is_ in CentOS6, Fedora17..22. And will.
>> Here is mentioned that the lxqt is the continuation of the razor desktop:
>> "The LXDE and Razor-qt teams are proud to announce LXQt 0.7.0, the
>> first release of LXQt, the Qt Lightweight Desktop Environment. This
>> beta release is considered a stable continuation of the Razor desktop."
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/p/lxde/mailman/message/32310545/
>>
>> Is like you want to have two versions of a program in parallel
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
> Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
> Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
> Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
> _______________________________________________
> Lxde-list mailing list
> Lxd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list