From: Jerome L. <ad...@gm...> - 2013-11-07 10:06:24
|
Agreed. J. Leclanche On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Petr Vanek <pe...@ya...> wrote: > On 11/07/2013 04:22 AM, PCMan wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Andrej N. Gritsenko <an...@re...> > wrote:The last one is .directory approach. I like this one, too. Windows > uses similar method to store other info, such as directory icon. It uses a > hidden file "desktop.ini" in every folder for that. > Pros: constant access speed. No db lookup, easy to implement, no other > dependencies. Portable, easily managed, and can be preserved even when you > create backup for the folder. > Cons: When you create a tar file for the folder, it will be included. It's > hard to delete them all if you want to uninstall pcmanfm. Also, remember to > add it to .gitignore. This is quite annoying. It's also visible to the user > if you turn on "show hidden files", which is really bad. > > > the "one hidden file per directory" is quite annoying. I have many these > files on my OS X laptop - it's copied everywhere and services like > owncloud/dropbox... has to be configured to ignore these files. > > For me it's clear - use cache or filesystem attributes. > > p. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers > Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore > techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most > from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and > register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Lxde-list mailing list > Lxd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list > |