From: PCMan <pcm...@gm...> - 2013-08-06 13:04:00
|
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Petr Vanek <pe...@ya...> wrote: > we tried to create wverything we can under LGPL2+ and almost all our > code was under this license. > Only some 3rd party stuff use GPL/BSD/do what you want license mix > > On 08/06/2013 01:54 PM, Samuel Stirtzel wrote: >> 2013/8/6 PCMan <pcm...@gm...>: >>> For ease of future development, I took some time and tried to split >>> the monolithic razor-qt repo into smaller splitted ones with all >>> history preserved. >>> >>> Please see this: >>> https://github.com/lxde >>> >>> Repos are renamed to avoid conflicts with the original razor programs. >>> Members of the original razor-qt@github are also added to lxde@github. >>> >>> All components do not compile now, and libraries are not yet split. >>> The CMake rules need to be fixed before they can be compiled correctly. >>> I'll try to see if I know how to do it later. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >> Hi, >> >> any info about what license the new code will use? >> Just asking as I see no COPYING files around. >> Fixed! It seems that razor-config-mouse is the only part that uses GPL. Other existing razor-qt components are using LGPL2. I just added COPYING and AUTHORS files to the repos. Later I'll try to fix the broken makefiles to make them compile again. Thanks. |