From: Stephan S. <gma...@sp...> - 2013-07-28 10:36:51
|
Hmm. Well, in that case, I suppose my only complaint is that I find even Bugzilla to have a more comfortable UI than SourceForge's issue tracker. (Bugzilla may have quite the learning curve, but once I got used to it, I found it comfortable. SourceForge's issue tracker just never seems to get comfortable.) However, keep in mind that, by bringing my mistaken assumption to your attention so you could correct it, I've become part of a small minority of users. Unless SourceForge somehow makes a clean break between whatever they currently offer and their old bug tracker in peoples' minds, it's a problem that's going to drag on willingness to participate among potential new community members. (The "if you need to personally respond to clarify/correct something", then the solution is broken because there will be many others who are affected and don't contact you about it." principle.) On 13-07-28 06:17 AM, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote: > Hello! > > Stephan Sokolow has written on Saturday, 27 July, at 22:12: >> ...plus, the fact that SourceForge automatically closes bugs that have >> lain dormant for too long is a major discouragement and smacks of >> assuming that everyone wants the CADT model. > > First, SourceForge closed the bugs only marked as Pending, not Open > ones. Second, it doesn't do that for long enough time, I marked few bugs > as Pending last year and they were never closed. I suppose they got few > requests to disable the feature so they've disabled it. > > Cheers! > Andriy. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > |