From: Jonathan A. <eag...@gm...> - 2014-01-10 18:01:22
|
Hey guys what do you guys think of replacing LSP with a wordpress based site that tis easy to upload stuff and sign up for an account as well as provide comments and feedback with out needing us to code anything and maintain anything? Again this is something I am willing to host. -- Jonathan Aquilina |
From: Tres F. <tre...@gm...> - 2014-01-10 18:10:16
|
I vote Drupal. I know WordPress is popular but its also is the most hacked when its out if date and adding custom php content is a mess. It treats pages as blog posts and in my extensive testing it's not ideal for a project page. What other CMS's does our community have experience with? -Tres On Jan 10, 2014 1:01 PM, "Jonathan Aquilina" <eag...@gm...> wrote: > Hey guys what do you guys think of replacing LSP with a wordpress based > site that tis easy to upload stuff and sign up for an account as well as > provide comments and feedback with out needing us to code anything and > maintain anything? > > Again this is something I am willing to host. > > -- > Jonathan Aquilina > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Lmms-users mailing list > Lmm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users > > |
From: Jonathan A. <eag...@gm...> - 2014-01-10 18:12:10
|
I have had experiences with drupal where its a spam fest. the latest wordpress is now set to automatically update itself. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < tre...@gm...> wrote: > I vote Drupal. I know WordPress is popular but its also is the most > hacked when its out if date and adding custom php content is a mess. > > It treats pages as blog posts and in my extensive testing it's not ideal > for a project page. > > What other CMS's does our community have experience with? > > -Tres > > On Jan 10, 2014 1:01 PM, "Jonathan Aquilina" <eag...@gm...> > wrote: > >> Hey guys what do you guys think of replacing LSP with a wordpress based >> site that tis easy to upload stuff and sign up for an account as well as >> provide comments and feedback with out needing us to code anything and >> maintain anything? >> >> Again this is something I am willing to host. >> >> -- >> Jonathan Aquilina >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Lmms-users mailing list >> Lmm...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users >> >> -- Jonathan Aquilina |
From: Tres F. <tre...@gm...> - 2014-01-10 18:47:32
|
Another thing to consider is how easy or hard it is to get the LSP over. I've spent a considerable amount of time evaluating Sharepoint, DotNetNuke, Joomla, Drupal, Wordpress. The first two are out by default for fairly obvious reasons. Although Wordpress was the easiest to setup and use, it was hands down the worst to customize in terms of custom php code. Joomla's administrative interface performed very slow and was confusing to navigate. Wordpress is a blogging platform first and foremost, so if that's what the site needs, I understand the leverage, but I would advise against it, if my vote counts. -Tres - Tre...@gm... On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Jonathan Aquilina <eag...@gm...>wrote: > I have had experiences with drupal where its a spam fest. > > the latest wordpress is now set to automatically update itself. > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < > tre...@gm...> wrote: > >> I vote Drupal. I know WordPress is popular but its also is the most >> hacked when its out if date and adding custom php content is a mess. >> >> It treats pages as blog posts and in my extensive testing it's not ideal >> for a project page. >> >> What other CMS's does our community have experience with? >> >> -Tres >> >> On Jan 10, 2014 1:01 PM, "Jonathan Aquilina" <eag...@gm...> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey guys what do you guys think of replacing LSP with a wordpress based >>> site that tis easy to upload stuff and sign up for an account as well as >>> provide comments and feedback with out needing us to code anything and >>> maintain anything? >>> >>> Again this is something I am willing to host. >>> >>> -- >>> Jonathan Aquilina >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >>> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >>> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >>> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >>> >>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lmms-users mailing list >>> Lmm...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users >>> >>> > > > -- > Jonathan Aquilina > |
From: Tobiasz K. <un...@gm...> - 2014-01-14 23:32:47
|
Maybe it'd be sufficient to run a LSP-modernisation project and fix what's broken there? Anyway - are you thinkng about porting old content to any new platform that might be chosen, or just leaving the old LSP as a read-only archive with a notice left for users to "go to another page" for uploading? 2014/1/10 Tres Finocchiaro <tre...@gm...> > Another thing to consider is how easy or hard it is to get the LSP over. > > I've spent a considerable amount of time evaluating Sharepoint, > DotNetNuke, Joomla, Drupal, Wordpress. > > The first two are out by default for fairly obvious reasons. > > Although Wordpress was the easiest to setup and use, it was hands down the > worst to customize in terms of custom php code. > > Joomla's administrative interface performed very slow and was confusing to > navigate. > > Wordpress is a blogging platform first and foremost, so if that's what the > site needs, I understand the leverage, but I would advise against it, if my > vote counts. > > -Tres > > - Tre...@gm... > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Jonathan Aquilina <eag...@gm... > > wrote: > >> I have had experiences with drupal where its a spam fest. >> >> the latest wordpress is now set to automatically update itself. >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < >> tre...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> I vote Drupal. I know WordPress is popular but its also is the most >>> hacked when its out if date and adding custom php content is a mess. >>> >>> It treats pages as blog posts and in my extensive testing it's not ideal >>> for a project page. >>> >>> What other CMS's does our community have experience with? >>> >>> -Tres >>> >>> On Jan 10, 2014 1:01 PM, "Jonathan Aquilina" <eag...@gm...> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey guys what do you guys think of replacing LSP with a wordpress based >>>> site that tis easy to upload stuff and sign up for an account as well as >>>> provide comments and feedback with out needing us to code anything and >>>> maintain anything? >>>> >>>> Again this is something I am willing to host. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jonathan Aquilina >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >>>> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >>>> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >>>> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >>>> >>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Lmms-users mailing list >>>> Lmm...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users >>>> >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Jonathan Aquilina >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Lmms-users mailing list > Lmm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users > > -- Tobiasz *unfa* -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT/MU/P d->-- s+:-(--)> a? C++(+++)>$ ULC+(++)>$ !P? L+++>++++$ E? W++>$ !N-? !o--? K-? !w-- O? !M-- V? PS++ PE++ !Y+ !PGP+? !t(+) 5? !X !R+ tv b+>+++ DI>+ D+ G e h-->- !r y--() ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
From: Jonathan A. <eag...@gm...> - 2014-01-14 23:37:25
|
I dunno I had volunteered to start on this a while back and got caught up in my studies but now I have the time to continue @toby can i get the django stuff. Is that in a repo in github? as I would like to start working on LSP2 again. I was thinking migrate all the existing content to the new lsp2. As a way to show appreciation to the contributors and that even as the project evolves On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Tobiasz Karoń <un...@gm...> wrote: > Maybe it'd be sufficient to run a LSP-modernisation project and fix what's > broken there? Anyway - are you thinkng about porting old content to any new > platform that might be chosen, or just leaving the old LSP as a read-only > archive with a notice left for users to "go to another page" for uploading? > > > 2014/1/10 Tres Finocchiaro <tre...@gm...> > >> Another thing to consider is how easy or hard it is to get the LSP over. >> >> I've spent a considerable amount of time evaluating Sharepoint, >> DotNetNuke, Joomla, Drupal, Wordpress. >> >> The first two are out by default for fairly obvious reasons. >> >> Although Wordpress was the easiest to setup and use, it was hands down >> the worst to customize in terms of custom php code. >> >> Joomla's administrative interface performed very slow and was confusing >> to navigate. >> >> Wordpress is a blogging platform first and foremost, so if that's what >> the site needs, I understand the leverage, but I would advise against it, >> if my vote counts. >> >> -Tres >> >> - Tre...@gm... >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Jonathan Aquilina < >> eag...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> I have had experiences with drupal where its a spam fest. >>> >>> the latest wordpress is now set to automatically update itself. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < >>> tre...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>>> I vote Drupal. I know WordPress is popular but its also is the most >>>> hacked when its out if date and adding custom php content is a mess. >>>> >>>> It treats pages as blog posts and in my extensive testing it's not >>>> ideal for a project page. >>>> >>>> What other CMS's does our community have experience with? >>>> >>>> -Tres >>>> >>>> On Jan 10, 2014 1:01 PM, "Jonathan Aquilina" <eag...@gm...> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey guys what do you guys think of replacing LSP with a wordpress >>>>> based site that tis easy to upload stuff and sign up for an account as well >>>>> as provide comments and feedback with out needing us to code anything and >>>>> maintain anything? >>>>> >>>>> Again this is something I am willing to host. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jonathan Aquilina >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >>>>> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >>>>> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >>>>> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >>>>> >>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Lmms-users mailing list >>>>> Lmm...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jonathan Aquilina >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Lmms-users mailing list >> Lmm...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users >> >> > > > -- > Tobiasz *unfa* > > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.1 > GIT/MU/P d->-- s+:-(--)> a? C++(+++)>$ ULC+(++)>$ !P? L+++>++++$ E? W++>$ > !N-? !o--? K-? !w-- O? !M-- V? PS++ PE++ !Y+ !PGP+? !t(+) 5? !X !R+ tv > b+>+++ DI>+ D+ G e h-->- !r y--() > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > -- Jonathan Aquilina |
From: Tobias D. <tob...@gm...> - 2014-01-15 22:21:58
|
Hi, the database models for lsp2 are at github.com/lmms/lsp2 now - everybody feel free to get your hands dirty on this. Once everything is setup (and the database structure is kept), in theory it should be no problem to migrate all existing data. Toby |
From: Jonathan A. <eag...@gm...> - 2014-01-15 22:37:28
|
I am more then willing to host it for now. and in terms of database may i recommend during the development of LSP2 that we do not need to use a mysql database. If you have any questions I am familiar with django granted probably a bit rusty. But I can help you out. I think as well toby I probably should bump the version of django its using seeing as its probably rather outdated at the moment. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Tobias Doerffel <tob...@gm... > wrote: > Hi, > > the database models for lsp2 are at github.com/lmms/lsp2 now - everybody > feel free to get your hands dirty on this. Once everything is setup (and > the database structure is kept), in theory it should be no problem to > migrate all existing data. > > Toby > > -- Jonathan Aquilina |
From: Jonathan A. <eag...@gm...> - 2014-01-15 22:41:01
|
Already forked the repo hope to get working on it tomorrow :) On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Tobias Doerffel <tob...@gm... > wrote: > Hi, > > the database models for lsp2 are at github.com/lmms/lsp2 now - everybody > feel free to get your hands dirty on this. Once everything is setup (and > the database structure is kept), in theory it should be no problem to > migrate all existing data. > > Toby > > -- Jonathan Aquilina |
From: Tobiasz K. <un...@gm...> - 2014-01-16 23:59:03
|
Could we go for a tag system instead of a rigid, limited list of genres users can choose for their music? We could then brainstorm a list of tags to start with. On 15 Jan 2014 23:40, "Jonathan Aquilina" <eag...@gm...> wrote: > Already forked the repo hope to get working on it tomorrow :) > > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Tobias Doerffel < > tob...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the database models for lsp2 are at github.com/lmms/lsp2 now - everybody >> feel free to get your hands dirty on this. Once everything is setup (and >> the database structure is kept), in theory it should be no problem to >> migrate all existing data. >> >> Toby >> >> > > > -- > Jonathan Aquilina > |
From: Jonathan A. <eag...@gm...> - 2014-01-17 09:03:04
|
Tag system according to genre? If that is the case I might need to make some amendments to the database. On Friday 17 January 2014 00:58:56 Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > Could we go for a tag system instead of a rigid, limited list of genres > users can choose for their music? > > We could then brainstorm a list of tags to start with. > > On 15 Jan 2014 23:40, "Jonathan Aquilina" <eag...@gm...> wrote: > > Already forked the repo hope to get working on it tomorrow :) > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Tobias Doerffel < > > > > tob...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> the database models for lsp2 are at github.com/lmms/lsp2 now - everybody > >> feel free to get your hands dirty on this. Once everything is setup (and > >> the database structure is kept), in theory it should be no problem to > >> migrate all existing data. > >> > >> Toby > > > > -- > > Jonathan Aquilina |
From: Tobiasz K. <un...@gm...> - 2014-01-18 02:01:28
|
Could be. The non-extendable list of styles was not the best way to sort music. Dubstep was missing and others too. I think tags will work better (look at SoundCloud). On 17 Jan 2014 10:02, "Jonathan Aquilina" <eag...@gm...> wrote: > Tag system according to genre? If that is the case I might need to make > some > amendments to the database. > > On Friday 17 January 2014 00:58:56 Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > Could we go for a tag system instead of a rigid, limited list of genres > > users can choose for their music? > > > > We could then brainstorm a list of tags to start with. > > > > On 15 Jan 2014 23:40, "Jonathan Aquilina" <eag...@gm...> > wrote: > > > Already forked the repo hope to get working on it tomorrow :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Tobias Doerffel < > > > > > > tob...@gm...> wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> the database models for lsp2 are at github.com/lmms/lsp2 now - > everybody > > >> feel free to get your hands dirty on this. Once everything is setup > (and > > >> the database structure is kept), in theory it should be no problem to > > >> migrate all existing data. > > >> > > >> Toby > > > > > > -- > > > Jonathan Aquilina > > |