Re: [Libusb-devel] Example build and dylib version Mac OS X Lion

[Nathan H. <hj...@me...>]

I mean libusb-1.0.1.0.0.dylib not libusb-1.0.2.0.0.dylib when we break ABI compat (remember the library name *is* libusb-1.0). 0.0.0 as the version for 1.0.* doesn't bother me.

-Nathan

On Jan 12, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:

> 
> On Jan 12, 2012, at 6:42 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> 
>> Another thing, there was a discussion before about the dylib version,
>> the current generated dylib name is 1.0.0.dylib, is this considered
>> correct?
>> http://libusb.6.n5.nabble.com/Darwin-dylibs-always-marked-version-1-0-0-td2916892.html
> 
> Yeah, we still need to fix the library version. Not on the top of my list though as long as we change it to 2.0.0 when we break ABI compatibility.
> 
> -Nathan
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Mar 27 - Feb 2
> Save $400 by Jan. 27
> Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
> _______________________________________________
> Libusb-devel mailing list
> Lib...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-devel