Re: [Libusb-devel] libusb-3.0 API

[Travis <tra...@co...>]

On 7/17/2011 9:12 AM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2011.07.17 09:17, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> >  I think Pete misunderstood what I meant by that sentence, and soared
>> >  off into long reasoning based on that.
>    From what I am reading below, I don't think I do.
>
>> >  I wrote that most of the issues are well understood.
> How can you tell? Especially, as far as I am concerned, I am not sure
> that I understand that well how we're going to proceed on Windows wrt
> poll abstraction. The "issue" that we need something else than poll on
> Windows that leverages native Windows async mechanisms, such as events,
> is of course not hard to grasp (and not something that needs months to
> agree on), so I have to assume that your well understood issues applies
> to the problems that we expect to encounter during the implementation.
> Are you therefore telling me that I'm supposed to have good grasp of the
> issues I'm going to be faced with when I implement poll abstraction on
> Windows? Right now, I most certainly don't.

Not to put more words in peoples mouths but it seems you are both saying 
the same thing. ;)

I think figuring what these API potos will need to look like and the 
flow as-to how they will be called is the hard part.  After this is 
figured, Writing the actual windows source code is probably not a big deal.

Are you not both essentially saying this?

Regards,
Travis