Re: [Libusb-devel] libusb/windows: devices 'only detected in late pass' - ignoring?

[Xiaofan C. <xia...@gm...>]

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Pete Batard <pb...@gm...> wrote:
>> FYI, you may take a look at libusbK's hotplug implementation now that
>> it is just finished.
>
> Will do.
> I don't think it should be that different from what I have already
> implemented *twice*, in libwdi/Zadig and in libusb-pbatard/hp...
> Is there anything special the K hotplug implementation does, that might
> be of interest to libusb-1.0/Windows?

The basic implementation should be similar. Travis can probably
tell you more. But at least it has some advantages from my very
shallow look at the codes.
1) It has an example which works. libusb-1.0 Windows backend hp
branch has no examples at all.
2) Only devices that are supported by libusbK (using a supported driver)
are reported by plug events. This does not include driver-less devices.
I understand that you do not see this as an advantage though.

-- 
Xiaofan