From: Nathan H. <hj...@me...> - 2010-11-22 05:16:22
|
On Nov 21, 2010, at 10:08 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> Probably not going to be applied. > > How about an alternative patch that makes libusb not open the > device exclusively until it is needed (or requested)? Or I don't know. I will have to think about it. It may be a fix that is up to the application programmer. > perhaps simply add a flag that makes it open non-exclusively. > That last one should actually be quite simple, hrm :-) Unfortunately, devices can not be shared between processes. So, all opens are exclusive. -Nathan |