Re: [Libusb-devel] OpenUSB Synchronous I/O

[Michael L. <mil...@gm...>]

Okay. That's what I needed to know. Thanks.

On 9/11/07, Sophia Li - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China <Sop...@su...>
wrote:
>
> The backend can choose to implement one I/O pattern, synchronous or
> asynchronous. The frontend will do the remaining thing.
>
> If any backend will implement both I/O patterns, it is also fine. So it
> is up to the backend.
>
> Michael Lewis:
> > For the Linux backend in OpenUSB, I have only implemented the
> > asynchronous i/o functions. Is it preferable that the frontend detect
> > this and then use the asynchronous functions with it's own call back
> > (similiar to the simple_io_* functions in the libusb development
> > branch) OR would it be better for the backend to do this?
> >
> > What's everyone's opinion on this?
> >
> > --
> > Mike Lewis
> > mil...@gm... <mailto:mil...@gm...>
> >
> > "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
> > matter and those who matter don't mind."
> >      --Dr. Seuss
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libusb-devel mailing list
> > Lib...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-devel
> >
>
>


-- 
Mike Lewis
mil...@gm...

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter
and those who matter don't mind."
     --Dr. Seuss