From: Cody P. <cod...@gm...> - 2012-10-25 23:29:05
|
Ah, yes my mistake. I didn't mean Makefile, but I think you all figured out what I meant. Just wanted to maintain old behavior as much as possible from the user perspective. I don't particularly have any strong opinions on exactly how we generate those files (something akin to our current bootstrap process is fine with me as others have pointed out). I think we are all on the same page. Cody Sent from my iPhone On Oct 25, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Roy Stogner <roy...@ic...> wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Paul T. Bauman wrote: > >> 1. FEMContext work - Finish off hiding public members and putting in >> accessors. I can get this done pretty quickly so I don't think it >> would hold up a release, but nothing is broken at the moment. We are >> storing redundant FE info (not much) until we decide to break >> backward compatibility. > > Oh, I forgot about this. I'd definitely like such simple API > improvements to make it into the next release. > > I'd also like the DiffPhysics refactoring to be finished the way the > DiffQoI refactoring was, but hopefully this time without me slacking > off so long that Paul has to do it. I wouldn't be able to get to this > until next week, though. > --- > Roy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-devel mailing list > Lib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel |