From: Jed B. <je...@59...> - 2010-04-22 15:05:19
|
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:56:02 -0400, Boyce Griffith <gri...@ci...> wrote: > > > On 4/22/10 10:46 AM, Jed Brown wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:42:52 -0400, Boyce Griffith<gri...@ci...> wrote: > >> OK, then I am apparently confused about how PCFieldSplitSetIS is > >> intended to work. Does one call PCFieldSplitSetIS once for each field? > > > > Call it once per split (it creates a new split each time you call it). > > OK, got it. This was the source of my confusion --- I think I was > tripped up by the name of the function. I had assumed incorrectly that > PCFieldSplitSetIS would "reset" the IS associated with the PC rather > than "add" an additional IS. I should have looked at the source code! > Do you think it would be worth adding a note to this effect to the > documentation for PCFieldSplitSetIS? Thanks for your feedback, I'll clarify the documentation. Jed |