From: Derek G. <der...@in...> - 2008-09-17 10:00:00
|
It looks like someone (Ben?) moved the NOX configure test to be nested inside of the configure test for Trilinos. The reason I didn't do this initially is that it's actually possible to use NOX without the rest of Trilinos. In fact, you can even use NOX with Petsc Vectors! Currently that's not possible with the way I've implemented NoxNonlinearSolver in libMesh... but I left the possibility open for configuring the library with NOX support and _without_ the rest of Trilinos hoping that eventually we could try to use NOX with Petsc vectors (NOX, in fact, supports many different numeric data structure implementations). I'm not opposed to leaving it nested for now (since it _is_ required to have Epetra to use NoxNonlinearSolver for now)... but I just thought I would provide some insight into why I didn't do that in the first place. Derek |