From: Roy S. <roy...@ic...> - 2008-02-15 19:10:56
|
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Benjamin Kirk wrote: >> Are there any objections? I'm hoping that the number of people who >> are doing DG with high p elements and who can't conveniently >> regenerate their old solution files is zero. > > No objections here. The new EquationSystems IO stuff is not in an official > release, so if we are really motivated we could put a warning message in the > backwards-compatibility read method to alert anyone who might be reading an > affected file. The new IO functionality will be released with the new > numbering so there won't be an issue. That sounds ideal. Just a test for MONOMIAL or XYZ, with p > 2 in 2D or p > 1 in 3D, and a warning message suggesting they bug libmesh-users about it, then? Can you put it in? I don't like touching our I/O code. --- Roy |