Re: [Kdenlive-devel] XML representation for effects.

[Rolf D. <Rol...@ph...>]

On Monday 08 March 2004 22:54, Jason Wood wrote:
> > I don't think that is a problem.
> > Step 1 :  don't care
> > Step 2 :  have each effect in a fast/lowquality and slow/highquality
> > version Step 3 :  have a caching and locking mechanism for
> > prerendered/unchanges segments
>
> I disagree - it is a problem... but I do agree that it is not *your*
> problem.

well, step 2 is probably for piave.

> I need to start coding the fabled background rendering scheduler at som=
e
> point in time

This is what I meant with step 3.  I can clearly live with exchanging 2<-=
>3 in=20
time and have 3 first ;-)

Cheers, Rolf

--=20
contacts: www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/~dubitzky