From: Rolf D. <Rol...@ph...> - 2004-03-08 12:50:24
|
On Monday 08 March 2004 16:29, Jason Wood wrote: > > Why do we need the <effect> tag? It looks redundant... maybe I'm miss= ing > > something... why did we introduce it? > > I believe it is performing a similar job to a par tag - an effect is a > "video" that s the output of one or more videos manipulated in some way= =2E good, then let's kick it and call it <par> as in SMIL (like in the new=20 examples/ ) Cheers, Rolf --=20 contacts: www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/~dubitzky |