From: Till T. <ro...@tt...> - 2010-08-21 14:28:36
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/21/2010 11:29 AM, Dan Dennedy wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Simon Eugster <sim...@gm...> wrote: >> Regarding the title widget, I (as already stated before) vote for a >> rewrite anyways. Perhaps we can get rid of performance problems as >> well then. > > First of all, what is "monitor scene?" I use to call the monitor this way when editing geometries on it. Like when using Pan & Zoom and resizing the rectangle on the monitor. Probably not the best term for this. Any better idea? > Regarding a titler rewrite, I have a couple of suggestions. The window > needs to be more scalable than it is now - it is bigger than my screen > on my laptop. Also, might it be possible to make it as an overlay on > the clip monitor? Then, a tab sheet can contain the tools and other > widgets? Then, eventually, a variant of this tool can be extended as a > way to also use shapes/eye-dropper/wand for defining filter masks and > drawing into the alpha channel. Sounds like a good idea for a new titler. > > BTW, in thinking about masks (better term than "region"), I am > thinking about a way to modify MLT to allow one to place special > filters "Set mask" and "Apply mask" onto the filter stack. That way > one could designate one set of filters to apply with a mask, another > set with another mask, and others with no mask. The mask defined in > "Set mask" would be used with all filters below it and above "Apply > mask." And "Apply mask" clears the mask for filters below it until > another "Set mask." When the "Set mask" filter is selected, it could > expose the "mask monitor overlay widget" mentioned above. Also a very great and useful idea. Something like cheap node based effect editing ;) Starting in January 2011 I have the opportunity to write a research paper (correct term?) for school. I have been thinking about writing a MLT filter for masking using bezier curves (like masking using a polygon) & and a Kdenlive GUI for it. Combined with your idea this would be very useful. > > Just some thoughts. > >> I guess what you mean is that e.g. moving objects has a delay of around 0.2 s? >> For me the delay is much longer 0.2 s. Maybe around 1s. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxv4u0ACgkQzwEyz7QP6nRlZACgwuMIDLSRh4f5s1f389Sh6/v7 qeQAnjtejgijjgbE4X7fW6UfT+0vwFko =TI72 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |