From: guille l. <gui...@gm...> - 2009-12-15 09:17:16
|
ok, thanks for the info. guille 2009/12/15 Joshua O'Madadhain <jos...@gm...>: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:43 AM, guille lists <gui...@gm...> wrote: >> thanks for the response, >> >> 2009/12/14 Joshua O'Madadhain <jos...@gm...>: >>> JUNG doesn't support this: there are an exponential number of such paths. >> >> ok, thanks. I know there are exponential number of paths, I just want >> to test it in several relatively small and sparse graphs. >> >>> What problem are you trying to solve? >> >> it is not for a concrete problem, i just need to get all paths between >> two given vertexs and then do some computations for each path. Again, >> regardless of its complexity, i'm just interested in doing it, as: >> http://www.itl.nist.gov/div897/sqg/dads/HTML/allSimplePaths.html > > The definition is clear, thanks, and you can write the code to do this > using JUNG if you like. As you noted, we don't have a generic DFS > implementation, but it's not hard to write one. But I don't expect > that we'll be providing an implementation ourselves anytime in the > easily foreseeable future. > > If you run into problems implementing this yourself, let us know and > perhaps we can help. > > Joshua > >> >> guille >> > > > > -- > jos...@gm......................www.ics.uci.edu/~jmadden > Joshua O'Madadhain: Information Scientist, Musician, Philosopher-At-Tall > It's that moment of dawning comprehension that I live for. -- Bill Watterson > My opinions are too rational and insightful to be those of any organization. > |