Re: [jgroups-users] UNICAST3 number of received messages

[Andrei P. <and...@go...>]

In the SEQUENCER, I managed to get the correct number of broadcasts made by
the coordinator (is given by bcasts_sent).
However, in the UNICAST3 I'm still missing few messages. This is what I get
at the end of the file 50000, 49953, 14475.
The first number is the number of broadcasts made by the SEQUENCER, the
second number is the number of unicast messages received in UNICAST3 and
the third number is the timestamp. Ignore the other 2 numbers.To separate
the retransmissions from the actual messages,
I used a map for each sender. The UNICAST3 adds a sequence number in the
header of the message and I use that number
to identify if the message has been retransmitted or not. What I'm trying
to measure is the service + waiting time of messages
using the fixed sequencer protocol. This is the numbers I get when not
using FC. In this case I have five sending processes each sending 10000
messages.


PS. Sorry for duplicating this message, but the first one since is quite
large expects moderator's approval before being posted.
You'll be able to see the entire file in the first message.


On 21 March 2014 14:00, Andrei Palade <and...@go...> wrote:

> In the SEQUENCER, I managed to get the correct number of broadcasts made
> by the coordinator (is given by bcasts_sent).
> However, in the UNICAST3 I'm still missing few messages. Have a look at
> the attached txt file. The first number is the number
> of broadcasts made by the SEQUENCER, the second number is the number of
> unicast messages received in UNICAST3 and
> the third number is the timestamp. Ignore the other 2 numbers.To separate
> the retransmissions from the actual messages,
> I used a map for each sender. The UNICAST3 adds a sequence number in the
> header of the message and I use that number
> to identify if the message has been retransmitted or not. What I'm trying
> to measure is the service + waiting time of messages
> using the fixed sequencer protocol. If you look at the attached file you
> will notice that there are few unicast messages missing.
> This is the numbers I get when not using FC. In this case I have five
> sending processes each sending 10000 messages.
>
>


-- 
Andrei