From: Gilles E. <g....@fr...> - 2009-01-22 07:26:39
|
----- Original Message ----- From: David Raine To: IPCop devel Cc: Gilles Espinasse ; Olaf Westrik Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 10:02 PM Subject: Re: [Ipcop-svn] SF.net SVN: ipcop:[2363] ipcop/trunk/config/kernel/kernel.config.i486 ... > Totally agree. We need at the very least 512 to properly QoS an ADSL upload stream of > 2Mb/sec and up to 1024 to handle the faster 8Mb/sec plus schemes. > HZ is not an issue with non-ADSL upstream traffic, as this does not need the sub-frame > ADSL alignment timing. > We have only 100,250,300 and 1000 values for CONFIG_HZ. I didn't know for shaping. I think there is now far less modem connected with native ADSL traffic, most have switched to ethernet layer. I have too lowered CONFIG_HZ as a safety against lost interrupt that will probably happen with some ethernet not napi drivers. I have look at Ubunbu server config and they have CONFIG_HZ=100 and a few users that complain for related side effect. So I am afraid we need a compromize. Do you agree for CONFIG_HZ=250? Gilles |