From: Olaf W. <wei...@ip...> - 2008-11-25 10:54:05
|
Gilles, > But I just discover result may vary with same code and do not work in 100% > of the events. > It look there is a race and sometime you win, others you loose > With the patch reverted and 1.12.2, average ratio is 30% success, 70% > failure (tested on pxe boot with a PII 350, reset with motherboard switch > button) Can you test following modification? This works 100% for me on 2 test machines (both fail without this modification). I still do not fully understand why the behavior change between busybox 1.12.1 and 1.12.2, but this may well have been something not correct on our side. Index: src/installer/installer.c =================================================================== --- src/installer/installer.c (revision 2106) +++ src/installer/installer.c (working copy) @@ -452,6 +452,8 @@ fprintf(flog, "Boot is unknown ?!\n"); } + mysystem("/usr/bin/setfont lat0-16"); + /* USB keyboard modules are already loaded so no need to load them */ /* usbcore, ehci_hcd, ohci_hcd, uhci_hcd, usbhid */ Olaf -- A weizen a day helps keep the doctor away. |