From: Wayne S. <ws...@gm...> - 2005-02-28 12:02:49
|
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:44:13 +0100, Odd H. Sandvik <hen...@on...> wrote: > The main difference between the PPro and PII is that the Pro handles > 16bit code rather poorly. I would think this is irrelevant on Linux > though. :) Well the PII only added minor band aids to the 16-bit problems, but as you say it doesn't really matter. The big difference is that the PPro has a full speed cache on a separate die in the same package. That made it significantly faster that the PII, but also much more complicated so it had lower margins for Intel. ;-) Eventually the PII's had much higher clock rates so it didn't matter. The summary is that the machine has way more CPU than needed to saturate a 100 Mbit Ethernet. -Wayne (ex-Intel Pentium Pro engineer) |