From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-06-13 08:38:11
|
Support Requests item #3534365, was opened at 2012-06-11 09:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nicholassmith You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3534365&group_id=11118 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: configuration Group: None >Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nicholas Smith (nicholassmith) Assigned to: Ian Silvester (diem) Summary: Privoxy ignores toggle 1 with Dans Guardian Initial Comment: OS: Ubuntu 10.04+11.04 Browser: Chrome + FireFox (latest for both) Privoxy Version 3.0.19 (latest in apt) I've been working on a Privoxy + DansGuardian setup for a few days now and wanted the ad blocking functionality switched off whilst I worked on getting everything hammered out. If I set toggle to 1 it'll disable the ad blocking component of Privoxy fine if I point my browser through (so Firefox to 127.0.0.1:8118 for proxy setting) and ad's will appear. If I then point the browser through DansGuardian requests sent through DG will cause Privoxy to ignore the toggle status and resume ad blocking, is this expected behaviour or have I run into something strange? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Nicholas Smith (nicholassmith) Date: 2012-06-13 01:38 Message: There's no Squid involved, so it goes browser -> dans guardian -> privoxy. DG needs a proxy in between it and the web for doing parental control filtering etc but does no caching or anything else that I can see. I double checked and it's definitely going through Privoxy, no weird caching effect involved. Nick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fabian Keil (fabiankeil) Date: 2012-06-11 09:50 Message: The recommended debug directives are listed at: http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/contact.html#CONTACT-BUGS You should also double check that the requests actually reach Privoxy and aren't served from Squid's cache (assuming you use DansGuardian with Squid). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nicholas Smith (nicholassmith) Date: 2012-06-11 09:23 Message: Hi, Privoxy disabled with 'toggle 1' from 'toggle 0', so it's acting as a a dumb proxy essentially. DansGuardian connects via setting a configuration parameter telling it to go through Privoxy as a proxy connection, rather than using a standalone or integrated version of Privoxy. I can try enabling additional debug, what do you recommend? Thanks, Nick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ian Silvester (diem) Date: 2012-06-11 09:17 Message: Hi, How exactly have you disabled Privoxy's ad blocking? If you have changed a setting in its configuration file then this will be respected regardless of how Privoxy is called. I'm unfamiliar with DansGuardian but my gut feel is that this is a fault in that software rather than Privoxy - how does DansGuardian route on through Privoxy? Does it contain a duplicate copy of the config file perhaps? Or indeed a complete 'internal' installation of Privoxy?. You can further troubleshoot this by enabling some debug in Privoxy, at the very least to confirm whether DansGuardian is routing requests through your stand-alone Privoxy install or not. Ian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=211118&aid=3534365&group_id=11118 |