From: Willie S. <wi...@fr...> - 2004-03-30 14:25:28
|
Am Di, den 30.03.2004 schrieb Comix um 13:51: > On Tuesday 30 March 2004 12:20, Richard Bown wrote: > > > > Exactly - common interchange stuff is all very well if people stop talking > > and actually write some code at some point or other. Anyway, no great > > shakes here. A Hydrogen import filter for RG is something that we're > > solely responsible for so I've got no problem going ahead and implementing > > it. A bigger solution may appear at some point or other. > > > > > So MIDI would be best for now from my user's POV. > > > > Yeah, it would certainly help if Hydrogen could export directly to MIDI in > > some meaningful way. Anyway, it's probably time to stop crossposting this > > now. I've subscribed to hydrogen-devel if anyone wants to continue it on > > there. > Midi file output for hydrogen is planned in a near future, but for now you can > take a look directly at the h2song format, it's only a simple xml.. > > What about jack-midi? can this will be a solution? Maybe this would be the long-overdue opportunity to create a Linux system for "softsynths", based on JACK and MIDI. Maybe adding some XML file would be sufficient, to tell the host the clients name and purpose, how the client works, how to assign MIDI controls, stuff like that... -- Willie Sippel <wi...@fr...> [ z ] ! |