Couldn't see any active mailing list, so a bug will get everyone's attention.
I'll be maintaining the Debian package of HFST as part of the Apertium packaging effort.
I already run a nightly packaging service which has up-to-date versions of HFST for all Debian/Ubuntu based distros:
http://www.mail-archive.com/apertium-stuff%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg04581.html
Debian control files are kept in Apertium's svn:
http://svn.code.sf.net/p/apertium/svn/branches/packaging/external/hfst/
There is a quirk in that HFST 3.7.x still builds libhfst36. Were there just no breaking API/ABI changes, or was that an oversight?
There were also issues with "make test" failing on 64bit archs, so I simply disable testing in the build.
Also, HFST still will not build in a single run with -j8, which is kinda annoying.
The stable packages will be made from svn. The released tarballs have pre-generated automake files, which are actually bad. Debian's debhelper can run autoreconf during building, avoiding the whole mess of pre-generation. So, for any stable release, I just need to know which svn revision it corresponds to.
I second handing over the deb stuff, Tino's versions of the packaging are much closer to debian quality standards and packaging style, I've been using them on my work machines for a while now. The parallel build fail is tracked in [#234] but there might be other problems. The svn revision of a release should always match the one that's indicated in the configure.ac and repeated by e.g., hfst-info application from hfst.hpp I think.
Related
Bugs: #234
I see no particular problems in giving over the Debian packaging to
Tino. It will take some practical work off Erik's schedule, but gives
him more time for testing and debugging as well as supporting other
platforms.
Regards,
Krister
On 22.8.2014 16:47, Flammie Pirinen wrote:
Related
Bugs: #234
Bugs:
#257