From: Felix <my...@ym...> - 2005-07-31 04:24:14
|
That would be a wonderful explanation... The only problem is that digikam doesn't recognize my camera, either (althoug it's listed as supported camera)... And somebody in digikam said that digikam relies on gphoto2, so I should check if gphoto2 recognizes the camera. And if it doesn't - then the best place to ask is gphoto2 list. Which is exactly what I did. So, if libgphoto2 is not *supposed* to recognize my camera, and digikam *relies* on gphoto2 to recognize the camera, how can the camera be supported by digikam? Thank you Felix Hubert Figuiere wrote: > Felix wrote: > >> maybe I wasn't clear in my original message - my main problem is that >> gphoto2 doesn't recognize my camera. I thought that my observations >> about automounting would be helpful... Unfortunately, it seems that >> they were irrelevant and even confusing. Oh, well - wouldn't be the >> first time :-) >> >> So, back to my original question... I have a fairly standard >> configuration FC4 (2.6.12), and KDE 3.4.2 and a fairly standard >> camera (Sony DSC-V1); gphoto2 recognizes the USB port (so, it doesn't >> look lik permission problem as somebody reported earlier); but it >> doesn't recognize the camera... > > > Let me explain one MORE time. You don't need libgphoto2 because your > camera is a Mass Storage device. That is what I already explained, but > apparently I was unclear to you. > > That is why libgphoto2 does not recognize it, because it does not > handle it, because it does not need to. > > As for reporting the USB port by gphoto2, that just means gphoto2 has > been compiled with proper USB support. Nothing more. > > What don't you understand in the above explanation ? > > Hub > |