From: Marcus M. <mei...@su...> - 2015-08-07 14:52:54
|
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:35:06PM +0200, Axel Waggershauser wrote: > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Marcus Meissner <mei...@su...> wrote: > > No, it means I am not migrating all of sf.net at once. > > > > svn <-> git would be possible, but I think not in the setup I did. > > (svn fetch on my side does not do, and I am not sure I can try svn dcommit) > > I was in no way trying to propose something like that, so I am totally > happy about the git move as it is. > > > >> Would I rather fork libgphoto2 and post pull-requests or keep on > >> sending you patches via e-mail for the time being? > > > > Whatever suits you. Self contained patches doing 1 thing as usual. :) > > Since I was advocating the whole git move, I'll surely take advantage > of the new possibilities. Please see my first pull request (containing > a gitignore file). > > > > I know that I have some patches open from you, but I wanted to do this > > first in the otherwise busy and distracting summer time. > > No stress, please. I saw, you committed the two "easy" ones of three > patches. Are you still looking into the third or would you rather not > make that more "invasive" change? If you want, I can put that into > another pull-request and we could discuss it there with the > possibilities to comment on individual lines, etc.? I will look into it. It has quite some regression potential, but the whole backoff topic needs to be cleaned up, revisited and adjusted I think. We are probably not doing the best we can currently. Ciao, Marcus |