Re: [GnomeSword-users] Help with Morphological searches w/ Lemma

[Karl K. <ka...@kl...>]

Peter von Kaehne <re...@gm...> writes:
> I think this is actually uncovering a bug:
> morph:<whatever> should work as should && to do a logical AND.

I had a conversation with Troy about exactly this about a month ago.  He
said that the current lucene indexing keys do not include morph, so this
is now on his list of things to add "soon".  He intends to add a fairly
extreme level of generality for the sake of users of commercial packages
like BibleWorks and Accordance, which generate a tokenized internal
index markup like this:

G2532@CONJ G3056@N-NSM G2258@V-IXI-3S

and then they expect their users to understand searches like

G2532@* *@N-NSM

I think it's somewhat twisted, but it does represent a (perverse) user
compatibility generality.

Anyhow, the point is, not right now, but in a (relatively) near-term
improvement.