RE: [Geotools-gt2-users] Security problem with geotools in an applet

[Parks, A. B. <ap...@rt...>]

Martin:

Signing the GT Libs is not necessary.  I think in most cases it would be =
better to have the applet under the  one signature of the client app.  =
Since it only has to be done once it's not a big time sink during the =
development process.

AP

-----Original Message-----
From: geo...@li... =
[mailto:geo...@li...] On Behalf Of =
Martin Desruisseaux
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 5:40 AM
To: geo...@li...
Cc: geo...@li...
Subject: Re: [Geotools-gt2-users] Security problem with geotools in an =
applet


Parks, Aaron B. a =E9crit :
> I was doing something similar and had to sign the various geotools=20
> Jars that accessed stuff on the HD.  Specifically:
>=20
> myApplet.jar
> Gt2-shapefile.jar
> Gt2-main.jar

Should we sign Geotools JAR as part of the build process (I mean, can it =

be a cause of trouble for some applications?). I can add this step to=20
the Maven 2 build if desired (but not in Maven 1 build). However, it may =

take a few weeks before the Maven 2 build is fully functional.

	Martin.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 =
Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information =
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list Geo...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users