From: Andrea A. <and...@ge...> - 2013-06-28 15:00:55
|
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Chris Holmes <ch...@op...> wrote: > Looking at it I think it needs to be as complicated as your questions > imply. > > You don't need to set a target amount. People just post the incentive for > what it is worth to them. If no one fixes then no one does. > I can be ok with the rest, but this point seems really weird to me. Like, I would never allocate money on a ticket without knowing what the total amount needed to solve the issue is? Do you think the funding for OL3 would have gone well if they did not set an expectation beforehand? Given that every bug fix needs a test, probably a backport to the stable series, and if it's not the maintainer doing the work, a review, I'd say there is no such a thing like a 100$ fix that people could just carelessly put money against. Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it ------------------------------------------------------- |