From: Michael B. <mic...@gm...> - 2011-03-26 05:45:07
|
On 25 March 2011 08:59, John Moore <geo...@ti...> wrote: > Original: > > +---------------+ > | | > | +---------+ > | A | | > | \ B | > | / | > | / +---------+ > +-----v---------\ | > | | > +-------------------+ > > Becomes with the method you sent: > +---------------+ > | | > | +---------+ > | | > | | > | | > | +---------+ > +---------------+ | > | | > +-------------------+ > > Instead of desired: > +---------------+ > | | > | +---------+ > | A | | > | | B | > | | | > | | +---------+ > +---------------+ | > | | > +-------------------+ > Ah - bummer. I was aiming for the second case but obviously didn't get it right. I'll take a look at it again and try to post a more reliable example. Michael |