From: Andrea A. <aa...@op...> - 2009-02-28 01:25:58
|
Rob Atkinson wrote: > (warning - rhetorical question) Why do we want a SimpleFeature at all? > It seems to me to be partly to implement an implied contract with all > the previous users of Feature, not because there is any intrinsic > reason that any of the previous uses actually needs to have the > constraints of Simpleness enforced. You like complex and slow features, I like simple and fast ones. To each one is own ;-) Corner me in a situation where only slow and bloated stuff is possible, and I'll loose interest in the project (seriously). Cheers Andrea |