Re: [Geotools-admin] Summary section please

[Jody G. <jga...@re...>]

Hi Cameron; just a follow up here - I updated the status page here: 
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoTools_Project_Status#Code_Copyright_Review
Does this serve as a good summary of the issues raised? I think it does 
and have copied this text over the the project status page.

All the best,
Jody

Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Re question at bottom of this email:
> "Do we ready need a Summary?"
>
> No, you don't need a Summary, but all good technical documents have 
> one, and I don't think a providence review should be any different.
> There will be many people likely to start reading this document, and 
> most of them don't want to know the details. A summary allows a reader 
> to quickly determine whether it is worth their while continuing to the 
> end or not.
>
> Jody Garnett wrote:
>> I found on this page 
>> (http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoTools_Project_Status) a section near 
>> the end where it links to the provenence review page and talks about 
>> issues. I have updated this information.
>>
>> Cameron I am not sure if we should provide a summary? The other 
>> projects did not ... they expected the committee to read the review 
>> document; the fact that this document is massive for geotools should 
>> not effect that should it?
>>
>> Jody
>
>