From: Adrian C. <ac...@gm...> - 2008-05-21 20:12:51
|
Yeah, That's martin's code keeping us honest during the build. The best thing would be to rename the directory rather than tweaking the artifactID. Other than that, we'll have to make an exception in the script but that would break the default maven site generation for that directory. --adrian On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 12:56 -0700, Graham Davis wrote: > I've been trying to resolve this by doing what the WFS XSD module is > doing. That pom file just renames the artifact id of the module to > gt-xsd-wfs. But when I did this with the WPS XSD module, like this: > > <groupId>org.geotools.xsd</groupId> > <artifactId>gt-xsd-wps</artifactId> > > I get this maven compile error: > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Invalid <artifactId> "gt-xsd-wps". Expected "gt-wps" (derived > from the directory name). > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Total time: 4 minutes 21 seconds > [INFO] Finished at: Wed May 21 12:40:02 PDT 2008 > [INFO] Final Memory: 42M/89M > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Anyone know what I am missing or what is wrong? I've been comparing > this to what the WFS XSD module is doing and can't see any immediate > differences. > > Graham. > > Jody Garnett wrote: > > Hi Adrian; we just ran into a conflict between unsupported/wps and > > xsd/wps as well. We have experimented with making the eclipse project > > name template into "gt-xsd-[artifactId]" in the xsd/pom.xml. > > > > Are you suggestion changing the artifact / jar / folder name all > > together? What does mvn site:site think we should do... > > > > Cheers, > > Jody > > > > Adrian Custer wrote: > > > >> Hey both, > >> > >> Any chance we could rename that module? Right now it gives us "gt-core" > >> which would confuse me if I landed on Geotools today. > >> > >> Could we call it "gt-xml-core", "gt-xmlnew-core" or some such? > >> > >> thanks, > >> --adrian > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Geotools-devel mailing list > >> Geo...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > >> > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Geotools-devel mailing list > > Geo...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > > > > |