From: Martin D. <mar...@ge...> - 2006-08-11 13:30:21
|
sezar a =C3=A9crit : > the jars with epsg are: > gt2-epsg-access-2.2-RC3.jar > gt2-epsg-hsql-2.2-RC3.jar > gt2-epsg-postgresql-2.2-RC3.jar > gt2-epsg-wkt-2.2-RC3.jar Could you try to put in the classpath only one of those? Try: gt2-epsg-hsql-2.2-RC3.jar and try again in an other test: gt2-epsg-wkt-2.2-RC3.jar and tell me if one is better than the other. What I'm suspecting: I noticed that the first CRS uses: DATUM["European Datum 1950(1977)", ... TOWGS84[-123.02, -158.95, -168.47, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0] while the second CRS uses: DATUM["European Datum 1950", .. TOWGS84[-157.89, -17.16, -78.41, 2.118, 2.697, -1.434, -1.10970465= 76093785] Both datum are considered differents, because the names are not exactly t= he same. They also have=20 different TOWGS84 parameters. However I wonder if they were not supposed = to be considered the same.=20 Because gt2-epsg-wkt do not supports datum shift through Bursa-Wolf param= eters, if gt2-epsg-wkt=20 gives closer results, then this means that the above-cited datum should b= e considered as the same one. Martin. |