Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] Using xsl:import instead of xsl:include

[Francois-Xavier P. <fra...@ca...>]

Hi Richard,

Quoting Software Improvements gn-devel <gn-...@so...>:
> By using xsl:import instead of xsl:include, the
> definition of the template in main.xsl has a lower
> import precedence and is overridden by the definition
> in main-page.xsl.  We get exactly the same result,
> but the key difference is that it's now correct XSLT
> according to the specification.
I noticed that also yesterday. If we plan to move from xalan to saxon it could
be nice to replace xsl:include by xsl:import ?

Ciao. Francois

> Perhaps my concern is only theoretical, as no XSLT
> transformer rejects (or will ever reject) a stylesheet
> with conflicting definitions of the same template?
>
>
> --
> Richard Walker